Geomechanics.io

  • Free Tools
Sign UpLog In
AllGeotechnicalMiningInfrastructureMaterialsHazardsEnvironmentalSoftwarePolicy

Geomechanics.io

Geomechanics, Streamlined.

© 2026 Geomechanics.io. All rights reserved.

Geomechanics.io

CMRR-ioGEODB-ioHYDROGEO-ioQCDB-ioFree Tools & CalculatorsBlogLatest Industry News

Industries

MiningConstructionTunnelling

Company

Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyLinkedIn
    Projects
    Contract Award

    Dogger Bank South DCO delay: design and procurement impacts for engineers

    January 9, 2026|

    Reviewed by Tom Sullivan

    Dogger Bank South DCO delay: design and procurement impacts for engineers

    First reported on New Civil Engineer

    30 Second Briefing

    UK ministers have pushed back the Development Consent Order decision for the two 1.5GW Dogger Bank South offshore wind farms, extending the statutory deadline from 10 January 2026 to 30 April 2026. The schemes, totalling 3GW in the North Sea, would require extensive offshore foundations, subsea cabling and grid connection works comparable in scale to the existing Dogger Bank A, B and C projects. The four‑month delay prolongs design and procurement uncertainty for marine geotechnical campaigns, fabrication yards and onshore grid reinforcement planning.

    Technical Brief

    • Environmental baseline monitoring campaigns (metocean, benthic, UXO) may need extension to keep datasets current for consent.
    • For other UK offshore NSIPs, the delay reinforces the need for flexible procurement and modular construction sequencing.

    Our Take

    Among recent UK Policy pieces in our database, offshore energy consents are one of the slower-moving categories, so pushing Dogger Bank South decisions into late April 2026 likely compresses procurement windows for major contract awards on grid connection and foundations.

    With each Dogger Bank South windfarm sized at around 1.5 GW, any delay in the Development Consent Order stage tends to ripple into port upgrade and cable‑route planning on the east coast of the United Kingdom, where several other large Projects‑tagged schemes are already competing for marine construction capacity.

    Across the 70 Policy stories in our coverage, UK offshore schemes facing timetable extensions often end up revisiting design envelopes or mitigation packages, which can add engineering scope for consultants and contractors but also introduce rework risk for early FEED and survey campaigns.

    Geotechnical Software for Modern Teams

    Centralise site data, logs, and lab results with GEODB-io, CMRR-io, and HYDROGEO-io.

    No credit card required.

    • Save and export unlimited calculations
    • Advanced data visualisation
    • Generate professional PDF reports
    • Cloud storage for all your projects

    Prepared by collating external sources, AI-assisted tools, and Geomechanics.io’s proprietary mining database, then reviewed for technical accuracy & edited by our geotechnical team.

    Related Articles

    Government policies to drive mining investment in 2026: key takeaways for project teams
    Policy
    about 19 hours ago

    Government policies to drive mining investment in 2026: key takeaways for project teams

    Government policy is set to dominate mining investment in 2026, with 47% of respondents to White & Case’s Mining & Metals 2026 survey citing political variables and nearly 40% expecting state‑backed financing to be the main tool in developed markets. Some 73% foresee widening divergence between US and Chinese critical minerals policy, while a funding gap between the US and Europe is seen as a key opportunity, alongside risks of over‑expansion and a two‑to‑three‑year “gold rush” bubble. Copper and gold are viewed as the “sure bet” price risers, with gold miners seen as prime consolidation targets and strategic partnerships favoured over traditional M&A.

    Sustainability and transparent reporting in construction: key shifts for engineers
    Policy
    1 day ago

    Sustainability and transparent reporting in construction: key shifts for engineers

    Sustainability reporting in construction is described as fragmented and inconsistent, with project disclosures difficult to compare and data quality varying widely across contractors and asset owners. This patchwork approach is exposing schemes to reputational, regulatory and operational risk, particularly as clients demand verifiable carbon footprints, lifecycle assessments and supply chain traceability aligned with frameworks such as the GHG Protocol and EU taxonomy. For geotechnical and civil engineers, the direction of travel points to standardised metrics on embodied carbon in concrete and steel, site energy use and materials sourcing becoming routine contract requirements.

    Phil Layton as CECE president: decarbonisation and EU machinery rules for engineers
    Policy
    1 day ago

    Phil Layton as CECE president: decarbonisation and EU machinery rules for engineers

    JCB technical service director Phil Layton has begun a two-year term as president of the Committee for European Construction Equipment (CECE), representing the UK’s Construction Equipment Association. Layton plans to prioritise decarbonisation of construction machinery fleets, support for open global markets and a more competitive regulatory framework for European OEMs. CECE’s immediate policy push targets EU secondary legislation on road circulation of construction machinery and a guidance document for implementing the new Machinery Regulation, ahead of the CECE congress in London on 27–29 October.

    Related Industries & Products

    Construction

    Quality control software for construction companies with material testing, batch tracking, and compliance management.

    Mining

    Geotechnical software solutions for mining operations including CMRR analysis, hydrogeological testing, and data management.

    QCDB-io

    Comprehensive quality control database for manufacturing, tunnelling, and civil construction with UCS testing, PSD analysis, and grout mix design management.